SCI文章常见错误及指正

　　SCI（Scientific Citation Index)是美国科学信息研究所（ISI)编辑出版的引文索引类刊物，创刊于1964年。分印刷版、光盘版和联机板等载体。印刷版、光盘版从全球数万种期刊中选出3300种科技期刊，涉及基础科学的100余个领域。每年报道60余万篇最新文献，涉及引文900万条。

　　SCI文章写作是发论文过程中极其重要的一个环节，职称驿站根据多年运行经验总结出作者在SCI文章写作中常见的一些问题做了总结，希望作者在写作的同时注意以及尽量避免这些问题，希望对您所有帮助：

　　不能正确区分Results section和Discussion section

　　If you are going to do a both a Results and a Discussion section,separately,all commentary like this (the results’ meaning) should be moved to theDiscussion. The Results section should only state what you observed, not whatit means. This Journal does allow, and in fact recommends, a combined “Resultsand discussion”- you might want to use that format?

　　在不同的section里不断重复已有的信息，造成冗余

　　Methodology, hypothesis formation, and data interpretation do not belong in theResults section.

　　使用过长的语句

　　You had some veryimportant points that were not being made clearly because they were buriedwithin very very long paragraphs. Simply breaking these up into more manageablethoughts has greatly increased the impact of your writing.

　　文章题目大小写不规范

　　All words except for articles and prepositions should be capitalized in atitle, although some do not follow this guideline.

　　Introduction不符合期刊的要求

　　Some journal asks for a statement of aims or goals in the introduction，however some authors do not have thispart. Some journals specifically state that there should be no summary ofresults in the Introduction, yet the author put lot of details on this aspect.

　　滥用etc

　　The use of “etc.” in listing items in formal writing is not preferred. If moreitems should be mentioned, do so, otherwise it is better to leave “etc” out andbecause you said “such as ..”. the reader knows that the listed items are notthe only items.

　　从中文版本/高版本的公式编辑器中引入符号到论文中，造成一些读者无法阅读

　　Watch your symbols- these characters are showing up as rectangles in my copy.

　　错误用词

　　Wrong sentence: This phenomenon was in accordance with that seen in P.

　　aeruginosa.

　　Revised sentence: This observation was in accordance with that seen in P.

　　aeruginosa. (“phenomenon” usually means something very unusual.)

　　单复数误用

　　Wrong sentence: There are increasing evidences that…

　　Revised sentence: There is increasing evidence that.. (the noun “evidence”isnever pluralized by adding “s”.)

　　指代不明

　　Wrong sentence: An important finding of this study was that…

　　Revised sentence: An important finding of the present study was that…

　　(Watch your use of “this study” when you are referring to your own currentstudy. You just talked about a study on fluvastatin, so the reader assumes thatwhen you now say “this study”, you are still referring to the fluvastatinstudy. Use “the current study” or “the present study”, when referring to yourown work, to avoid this confusion.)

　　空洞的语句

　　Avoid “empty” words like “the data show” “the results indicated” “we foundthat” etc. The reader is aware that you did the study and that data weregenerated.

　　So the sentence “Meanwhile, we can readily find that a similar reduction in PCAproduction was caused by the rhlI mutation and the lasR rhlI double mutation”can be revised to “A similar reduction in PCA production was caused by the rhlImutation and the lasR rhlI double mutation”

《SCI文章常见错误及指正》 鏂囩珷鍐呭濡傛灉娌¤兘瑙ｅ喅鎮ㄧ殑闂锛屽彲鍏嶈垂鍜ㄨ鍦ㄧ嚎瀛︽湳椤鹃棶鑾峰彇鏈€浣宠В绛斻€�
鑱岀О椹跨珯閮戦噸澹版槑锛�
1銆侀儴鍒嗗唴瀹规潵婧愮綉缁滐紝濡傞渶鍒犻櫎璇疯仈绯绘湰绔欏湪绾夸汉鍛橈紒
2銆佹湰绔欐湇鍔″叏闈紝鍖呮嫭鏈熷垔鎺ㄨ崘銆佽鏂囧彂琛ㄥ挩璇€€佸嚭鐗堢ぞ鍑轰功绛夋湇鍔★紝濡傛湁闇€瑕佽鐐瑰嚮鍦ㄧ嚎鍜ㄨ銆�
3銆佹湰绔欏嚟鍊熷骞寸殑璁烘枃鍙戣〃鍜ㄨ缁忛獙锛屽鏍搞€佸彂琛ㄦ垚鍔熺巼楂樸€�
4銆佹湰绔欐嫢鏈夊骞村浗闄呭嚭鐗堢粡楠岋紝鍑虹増鏈嶅姟鏈変繚璇併€�

本文由职称驿站首发，您身边的高端论文发表学术顾问

文章名称： SCI文章常见错误及指正

文章地址： https://www.zhichengyz.com/news/10/23183.html